Crit­i­cal Media presents Sput­nik, a cel­e­bra­tion of space flight in col­lab­o­ra­tion with the Cana­di­an Space Soci­ety, held at the Toron­to Aero­space Muse­um.

On Octo­ber 4, 2007 we mark the 50th anniver­sary of the begin­ning of the age of space com­pe­ti­tion and explo­ration, dis­cov­ery, adven­ture, tragedy and exhil­a­ra­tion. On this day, five decades ago — Octo­ber 4, 1957- the first man-made satel­lite was launched into space, the first man-made object ever to orbit the Earth, cap­ti­vat­ing the public’s imag­i­na­tion world­wide. No larg­er than a water­mel­on and weigh­ing only 183 pounds, its “beep beep beep” sig­nal from space was heard with bait­ed breath as it trav­eled on its ellip­ti­cal path. “Now, some­how, in some new way, the sky seemed almost alien,” wrote Lyn­don B. John­son. The launch of Sput­nik ush­ered in a new era: the Space Age.

 SPUTNIK: Art, film, dis­cus­sion and more
6:30PM, Octo­ber 4, 2007
Toron­to Aero­space Museum,
Downsview Park
65 Carl Hall Road,
Toron­to, Ontario, M3K 2E1,
phone 416 638 6078

For a map of how to get there, check the Toron­to Aero­space Muse­um, or see below for direc­tions. [Note: The Toron­to Aero­space Muse­um is now per­ma­nent­ly closed.]

ADMISSION FREE – Dona­tions accepted.


6:15–7.15: Recep­tion and pre­sen­ta­tion of new media artist Slavica
Ceperkovic’s piece con­sist­ing of a con­tin­u­ous loop projection

7:15–8:00: Pre­sen­ta­tion on space era in USSR/Russia (Dr. Zeli­na Iskan­dero­va, Uni­ver­si­ty of Toronto)

8:00–8:25: Pre­sen­ta­tion: “Space Sci­ence and Sci­ence Fic­tion (Nina Czegledy, KMDI, Uni­ver­si­ty of Toron­to; Con­cor­dia University)

8:25–8:30: Screen­ing: “My first rock­et” (Amir Gavriely & Joel Robson)

8:30-: 9.30: Screen­ing: “The High Ground” (Michael Lennick, Fool­ish Earth­ling Productions)

9.30 ‑9:35: Stream­ing of “Sput­tnikk Oppera” live per­for­mance from Ljubl­jana (Igor Stro­ma­jer & Brane Zorman)

9:35–10:00: Discussion/Q&A with Michael Lennick

10:00–10:30: Screen­ing: “Des­ti­na­tion: Mars” ” (Michael Lennick, Fool­ish Earth­ling Productions)



By Tran­sit: Free shut­tle car ser­vice will be pro­vid­ed between Downsview TTC sta­tion and the Aero­space Muse­um between 6.15 ‑7.15 pm

By Car: From the 401 East or West, exit at Keele Street North. Turn right on Shep­pard Ave, and fol­low Shep­pard to the entrance to Downsview Park. Turn right into the park (onto John Drury Road) until you reach Carl Hall Road. Turn left at Carl Hall and con­tin­ue east over the rail­way tracks to the Muse­um, which is on your right-hand side.

By Taxi: Taxi fare from the Downsview TTC Sta­tion is approx­i­mate­ly $10.00.


Sput­nik Day 2007 was pro­duced in col­lab­o­ra­tion by Nina Czegledy, Lori Tures­ki, Amir Gavriely, Joel Rob­son, and Slav­i­ca Ceperkovic, and Crit­i­cal Media part­ners Greg Judel­man and Daniel Bar­ber. Spe­cial thanks to Kevin Shortt, Paul Cabot and theToron­to Aero­space Muse­um and the Cana­di­an Space Soci­ety. We are grate­ful for the gen­er­ous con­tri­bu­tion by Michael Lennick and Fool­ish Earth­ling Pro­duc­tions. Thanks also to Mag­da Wesalkovska.

For more infor­maiton, please con­tact Lori Tures­ki at ltureski<at>gmail.com or Nina Czegledy at czegledy<at>interlog.com

Curating New Media

Sun­day Decem­ber 2, 2001 10:00 — 5:00 p.m.
Arts Court The­atre, 2 Daly Avenue, Ottawa, Canada

A one-day pub­lic forum on the top­ic of the cur­rent state of new media art and its place with­in our gal­leries and production/distribution cen­ters, fol­low­ing from recent sem­i­nars on new media curat­ing co-host­ed by CRUMB in Eng­land (Baltic, May 2001; Media Cen­tre Hud­der­s­field, Octo­ber 2001). With mod­er­a­tors Sara Cook of Cura­to­r­i­al Resource Upstart Media Bliss and Nina Czegledy of Crit­i­cal Media. The sym­po­sium rep­re­sents a time­ly and unique oppor­tu­ni­ty to con­sid­er and dis­cuss among peers from across Cana­da, the issues aris­ing from the bur­geon­ing field of new media, high­light­ing some of the fis­sures and oppor­tu­ni­ties that have arisen in the shift­ing ground between tra­di­tion­al, insti­tu­tion­al­ly-based cura­to­r­i­al prac­tice and new mod­els less bound to spe­cif­ic locales. It seeks to ini­ti­ate a dia­logue between artists, venues, fun­ders and audi­ences by defin­ing and dis­cussing rel­e­vant issues and Cana­di­an practice.

The event will be com­prised of three ses­sions, cen­tered on the key areas of Pro­duc­tion, Dis­tri­b­u­tion, and Con­sump­tion. Each ses­sion will fea­ture 2 to 3 pre­sen­ta­tions fol­lowed by open dis­cus­sion. The pre­sen­ta­tions will focus pri­mar­i­ly on inclu­sive, over­all issues of pro­duc­ing, pre­sent­ing and expe­ri­enc­ing new media in Cana­da and will be illus­trat­ed by nov­el approach­es, prac­ti­cal exam­ples and will indi­cate direc­tions to take in the future. These include: the shift­ing rela­tion­ship of art to indus­try the hybrid role of artist-cura­tor online communities/local com­mu­ni­ty edu­ca­tion glob­al net­work dis­sem­i­na­tion the chang­ing role of muse­ums and col­lec­tions the cre­ation of new media pro­duc­tion cen­ters in region­al gal­leries, audi­ence inter­ac­tiv­i­ty art and sci­ence collaborations.

Sym­po­sium sched­ule and speak­er list:
10:00am TEA/COFFEE
Intro­duc­tions from Renee Baert, Nina Czegledy and Sarah Cook
10:30 – 12:15 PRODUCTION
Nichola Feld­man-Kiss (artist, Ottawa)
Michelle Kasprzak (artist and co-cura­tor of year.01, Toronto)
Cather­ine Richards (artist, Ottawa)
12:15 — 13:45 LUNCH BREAK
13:45 – 15:00 DISTRIBUTION
Kath­leen Pir­rie-Adams (Inter­ac­cess Gallery, Toronto)
Skawen­nati Tri­cia Frag­ni­to (inde­pen­dent cura­tor, cyber­pow­wow, Montreal)
15:00 — 15:20 TEA/COFFEE BREAK
15:20 — 16:50 CONSUMPTION
Jean Gagnon (Fon­da­tion Daniel Lan­glois, Montreal)
Liane Davi­son (Sur­rey Art Gallery, Sur­rey BC)
And speak­er TBA
16:50 — 17:00 CONCLUDING REMARKS — Sarah Cook and Nina Czegledy

CURATING NEW MEDIA received gen­er­ous sup­port from the Cana­da Coun­cil for the Arts and the Ottawa Art Gallery.Trinity Square Video and CRITICAL MEDIA pre­sen­ta­tion Thurs­day, Octo­ber 11, 2001 9pm

Crossing Over

curat­ed by Nina Czegledy & Iliyana Nedkova
at T R A N Z < — > T E C H, the 2nd Toron­to Inter­na­tion­al Video Art and new Media Bien­ni­al, Octo­ber 11–14, 2001, Lat­vian House, 359 Col­lege Street, Toronto

CROSSING OVER http://www.mediascot.org/ was born in the after­math of the bloody, vel­vet, singing, vir­tu­al – and often mis­un­der­stood – rev­o­lu­tions that have been delin­eat­ing a new Europe since the late 1980s.

From its incep­tion in Novem­ber 1996 CROSSING OVER has been fos­ter­ing con­tacts between the iso­lat­ed young art-prac­ti­tion­ers. The imme­di­ate goal was to ini­ti­ate prospec­tive con­tacts, dis­cuss var­i­ous pro­duc­tion pos­si­bil­i­ties and end up with a clear-cut con­cept and pro­duc­tion strategy.

CROSSING OVER has pre­sent­ed five incar­na­tions in main­land Europe, the UK and USA. In Octo­ber 2001, Toron­to becomes the first Cana­di­an city to host the event. CROSSING OVER#6 explores the issues of tow­er block liv­ing, urban/rural regen­er­a­tion, cul­tur­al migra­tion and net­work­ing. The new series will be intro­duced by co-cura­tors Iliyana Ned­ko­va (Foun­da­tion for Art&Creative Tech­nol­o­gy, Liv­er­pool) and Nina Czegledy (Crit­i­cal Media).

CROSSING OVER6 Com­mu­ni­ties, 2001
Fea­tured artists:
KINGA ARAYA (Poland/Canada), LUCHEZAR BOYADJIEV (Bul­gar­ia), OKSANA CHEPELYK (Ukraine), PHIL COLLINS (England/Northern Ire­land), ANNE-MARIE COPESTAKE (Scot­land), SAMANTHA HARRIE (Eng­land), ANDREA LANSLEY (Eng­land), LALA RASCIC (Bosna and Hertzogovina/Croatia). GUIA RIGVAVA (Georgia/Germany), PAUL ROONEY (Eng­land). LEVENTE SIPOS (Hun­gary), CHRIS SPEED (Eng­land)

co6 has been pro­duced with the finan­cial assis­tance of the Daniel Lan­glois Foun­da­tion for Art, Sci­ence and Tech­nol­o­gy, North West Arts Board, Liv­er­pool School of Art and Design, John Moores Uni­ver­si­ty, APEX­Changes, Euro­pean Cul­tur­al Foun­da­tion and Crit­i­cal Media.

co6 has been co-curat­ed by Iliyana Ned­ko­va and Nina Czegledy. It has been co-pro­duced by FACT in part­ner­ship with Mersey Film and Video, First Take, Media Sta­tion, Inter­na­tion­al Cen­tre for Dig­i­tal Con­tent, MITES, Ten­antspin, Liv­er­pool Hous­ing Action Trust and Odeon Cinema.


July 12, 2001 6 p.m.
Fac­ul­ty for Infor­ma­tion Stud­ies, Uni­ver­si­ty of Toronto
Room 307, 140 St. George Street, Toron­to, Canada.

CRITICAL MEDIA presents TELEANAMNESIS, a Brazil­ian ini­tia­tive involv­ing online and onsite events and pub­li­ca­tions, curat­ed by Simone Miche­lin PPGAV/EBA/UFRJ ; CAIIA-STAR/UK (chair). As part of this project, Kátia Maciel — CPM/ECO/UFRJCAIIA-STAR/UK, RJ André Par­ente — ECO/UFRJ; CAIIA-STAR/UK, Arthur da Távola ‑Sec­re­tary of Cul­ture, Jacque­line Bel­lot­ti — Direc­tor of Cen­tro Cul­tur­al Oduwal­do Vian­na Fil­ho of Brazil par­tic­i­pat­ed in a tele­con­fer­ence with Michael Alstad, Mark Jones, Michelle Kasprzak, and Dmytri Klein­er artists of Toron­to. The tele­con­fer­ence was mod­er­at­ed by Nina Czegledy.


  1. Telenoia’, telem­at­ic cul­ture and rad­i­cal con­struc­tivism: build­ing Nature II;
  2. the artis­tic appro­pri­a­tion of the tech­nolo­gies of telecom­mu­ni­ca­tion: strate­gies; pur­pos­es; experiments;
  3. how the tech­nolo­gies of intel­li­gence can help in the re-mate­ri­al­i­sa­tion of the world;
  4. envi­sion­ing the cities of the future;
  5. Broad­cast live cable TV MULTIRIO.

The web site, launched pri­or, con­tains info about the event, the par­tic­i­pants (texts, links to their sites) and works spe­cial­ly cre­at­ed for the TELEANAMNESIS project. The site also allowed users to fol­low the video­con­fer­ence on-line and participate.

Points of Entry

POINTS OF ENTRY is an international touring exhibition project of installations and embodied electronic sculptural works using technology, by Australian, Canadian and New Zealand artists.

The works address con­tra­dic­tions and diverse pos­si­bil­i­ties of work­ing with inter­ac­tive tech­nolo­gies. The instal­la­tions range from self-stand­ing kinet­ic sculp­tures, to what appears at first to be high speed mod­el cars, but on clos­er exam­i­na­tion are machines that move so slow­ly they take will decades to move a small dis­tance. A char­ac­ter­is­tic of all of the works is their phys­i­cal nature; some are sculp­tur­al, while oth­ers focus on phys­i­cal and spa­tial interaction.

POINTS OF ENTRY, the title of the show, implies options and pos­si­bil­i­ties for audi­ence engage­ment with the works. While the con­cept of inter­ac­tive art is sug­ges­tive of choice and free­dom, it is use­ful to con­sid­er the extent of these choic­es. The ques­tions remains: with­in the dig­i­tal domain of pre­con­ceived com­put­er works, pro­grammed vir­tu­al art and inter­ac­tive sculp­tures, how much actu­al free­dom, how much con­trol over our choice remains? Each work in the show takes a dif­fer­ent approach to these prob­lems, some use sim­ple inter­ac­tions, or have pre-pro­grammed behav­iours, oth­ers sub­vert the con­ven­tions of what we term “inter­ac­tiv­i­ty”. Cura­tors: Nina Czegledy, Robin Pet­terd, and Deb­o­rah Lawler-Dormer­Artists involved: Aus­tralia — Sophea Lern­er, Greg Bourke Leigh Hob­ba, Andrew Bur­rell Cana­da — Joce­lyn Robert and Daniel Jol­liffe, Jon Baturin, Simone Jones and Hope Thomp­son New Zealand — Sean Kerr and Kim Fogel­berg, Vir­gina King, Yuk King Tan, Alex Monteith

The artists/the select­ed works follows:


Ground Station

a col­lab­o­ra­tive instal­la­tion by Joce­lyn Robert and Daniel Jolliffe

Yama­ha Disklavier, video pro­jec­tor con­nected to G4 Mac computer.

Ground Sta­tion pro­duces music in real time by fol­low­ing the cur­rent azimuth, ele­va­tion and sig­nal strength of thir­ty-two Glob­al Posi­tion­ing Sys­tem (GPS) satel­lites. GS is in a sense an audi­ble reflec­tion of the activ­i­ties of the GPS net­work it watch­es. Where­as GPS was devel­oped as a posi­tion­ing tech­nol­o­gy to aid in war­fare, Ground Sta­tion (GS) inverts the tra­di­tion­al use of this data by watch­ing the posi­tions and move­ment of the satel­lites them­selves. As satel­lite posi­tion data is fed into GS, it is processed by an algo­rithm designed by the artists that fil­ters and transcodes this into musi­cal nota­tion. This unique, con­tin­u­ous musi­cal score is then played live through speak­ers, or in cer­tain ver­sions of the work on a Dysklavier piano.

In effect, Ground Sta­tion works by bor­row­ing data from the US mil­i­tary’s Glob­al posi­tion­ing satel­lite net­work. There are thus two sets of authors for the music GS pro­duces: the artist-pro­gram­mers who cre­ate and con­tex­tu­al­ize the work, and the mil­i­tary infra­struc­ture that main­tains and over­sees the GPS net­work. The con­nec­tion between these authors is a def­i­nite one: GS is com­po­si­tion­al­ly depen­dent on the data it receives from the GPS net­work, and in turn on the mil­i­tary’s own uplink sta­tions that con­trols the satel­lites. The cen­tral role of Schriev­er Air Force Base in the music pro­duced by GS is indi­rect yet sig­nif­i­cant, as this music depends on satel­lite tra­jec­to­ry, which is under direct mil­i­tary con­trol. With­out this ground con­trol, the music pro­duced by GS would even­tu­al­ly fade and cease, in par­al­lel with the decay of the satel­lites themselves.

Sys­tems aside, Ground Sta­tion was not con­ceived to cham­pi­on tech­nol­o­gy or the pos­si­bil­i­ties of com­put­er-based musi­cal com­po­si­tion. As col­lab­o­ra­tors we have lit­tle inter­est in the aes­thet­ics of the ‘music’ pro­duced by the piano. Rather, its goal is to pro­duce music as a kind of cul­tur­al arti­fact of the time and place we live in. Musi­cal­ly, GS relies on the sup­po­si­tion that musi­cal com­po­si­tion is a prod­uct of the time and place in which it is pro­duced, rather than its for­mal or syn­tac­ti­cal qual­i­ties. A piano played under the rock­et fire of wartime Beirut, for exam­ple, and Ground Sta­tionís piano-man­i­fest­ed satel­lite data are both musi­cal com­po­si­tions that reflect specif­i­cal­ly upon the social state of the cul­tures they are cre­at­ed within.

Ground Sta­tion sets out to make vis­i­ble dif­fer­ent cul­tur­al approach­es to tech­nol­o­gy, and to make audi­ble the invis­i­ble data that con­nects these approach­es. In this sense Ground Sta­tionís per­for­mance is not one of music but an aur­al trans­la­tion of the cur­rent tech­nol­o­gized soci­ety that we inhabit.

Joce­lyn Robert is inter­est­ed by the instant, the space between noth­ings, the ban­a­lyt­ic arche­ol­o­gy. Audio artist, video artist, instal­la­tion artist, etc artist, he first stud­ied as a phar­ma­cist, then as an archi­tect. He worked in archi­tec­ture until 1989, then he switched to full time art. He col­lab­o­rat­ed with Diane Landry, Bruit TTV, Arbo Cyber, and oth­ers on dif­fer­ent per­for­mances and instal­la­tions, and pro­duced sev­er­al solo works as well. He showed his work here and there while you were look­ing else­where. He pub­lished sev­er­al cds of his own audio work, on ReR records, Obz and Ohm Edi­tions, par­tic­i­pat­ed to anoth­er 20 with dif­fer­ent artists, showed inter­ac­tive instal­la­tions in gal­leries, pub­lished texts in books, inter­views in mag­a­zines, etc etc etc. Last Feb­ru­ary, he won the first prize in the New Image cat­e­go­ry of the Trans­me­di­ale Awards, in Berlin, with his com­put­er-video instal­la­tion L Inven­tion des Ani­maux. In 1993, with Pierre-André Arcand, Christof Migone and a few oth­ers, he found­ed Avatar, an audio artists-run cen­tre in Que­bec City and act­ed as pres­i­dent and artis­tic direc­tor of the cen­tre until 2001. These days he can be found in Cal­i­for­nia, study­ing in a lit­tle stu­dio between trees. He can be reached at jrontheroad@hotmail.com, and more infor­ma­tion on him and his work can be found at www.stanford.edu/~jrobert

Daniel Jol­liffe (Ontario, 1964). A media and visu­al artist since 1989, Daniel’s work is a syn­the­sis of sculp­tur­al prac­tice and elec­tron­ic tech­nolo­gies. His works take an orig­i­nal approach to the inter­ac­tion of the body and tech­nol­o­gy, cre­at­ing phys­i­cal­ly inten­sive expe­ri­ences which chal­lenge con­ven­tion­al notions of point and click inter­ac­tiv­i­ty. His inter­ac­tive works and tech­nol­o­gy based art projects have been shown across Cana­da and the Unit­ed States. He was until recent­ly co-direc­tor of the Dig­i­tal Earth in Van­cou­ver, B.C. which in 2000 pre­sent­ed ZDM: A Theme Park of Elec­tron­ic Cul­ture. He has taught work­shops intro­duc­ing artists to elec­tron­ic prac­tices both over­seas and across Cana­da. He is cur­rent­ly com­plet­ing a degree in Phi­los­o­phy at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Vic­to­ria, British Columbia.

Doukhoubor communal bath age 5”

a pho­to based instal­la­tion by Jon Baturin

communal-bathDoukhou­bor com­mu­nal bath age 5” is a mod­u­lar envi­ron­ment using sen­so­ry trig­gers, sound, heat and pho­to-based imagery. We see — sense — almost feel — warm bod­ies, thighs, bel­lies, flesh. Inner and out­er. Young and old. Ecsta­t­ic and mortified.

Com­mu­nal bath” occu­pies a phys­i­cal space (small) and psy­cho­log­i­cal space (large). It is tac­tile. Inti­mate. Com­fort­able, snug. A place for under­stand­ing — for belong­ing. Not a place to fear or a place to be feared.

I was 5. My moth­er was dying — had died of can­cer. We trav­eled to Grand Forks B.C. to spend heal­ing — and griev­ing — time with our Doukhobour fam­i­ly. There was rit­u­al song and rit­u­al prayer. Hugs and whis­pers. (Russ­ian & Eng­lish) Endear­ments and tears. warm laps.

The com­mu­nal bath-house. A place of tra­di­tion and lore; of fam­i­ly and of pre­cious bonds. A place for renew­al; for hope and for res­o­lu­tion for my father. A place to share me. A place for spir­it, for worth, for mean­ing. A place to embrace when god deserts. A place — when sense of place has gone. I was five. I knew none of this.

My Father shared steam, sweat, talk, grief. He cried copi­ous­ly. Our tears were deep water. Clean water. They fit this place. I learned that well. Sat qui­et. Sat low. Uncles and aunts, cousins. fam­i­ly friends. boy flesh. girl flesh. Man flesh. Innies and out­ies. Bel­lies and thighs. Met them all. (Met them often). Gen­tle hugs. Whis­per­ings. Qui­et pleas. “health/ dis­ease.…” “life / death.…” “…death…” “…death…” “…death…” lots and lots and lots of death.… too much for one aged 5.

So much old­er now. Yet I reside there still. see it again. See it often. The dead. Uncles and aunts, cousins. friends. boy flesh and girl flesh. Innies and out­ies. Bel­lies and thighs. Dan­g­ly bits. Death. Mor­ti­fi­ca­tion. Ever-present tragedy. Unre­quit­ed sor­row and — on occa­sion — unan­tic­i­pat­ed joy.”

Jon Baturin is Asso­ciate Pro­fes­sor and Pro­gram Direc­tor (Pho­tog­ra­phy and Explo­rations) York Uni­ver­si­ty, Toron­to Cana­da . He has in his recent pho­to-based and dig­i­tal work col­lab­o­rat­ed with visu­al artists, social activists, poets, nov­el­ists, actors, musi­cians from North Amer­i­ca, Eng­land, Chi­na, Aus­tralia, Brazil and the Caribbean.

His pho­to­graph­ic and dig­i­tal works have been shown exten­sive­ly including:

  • Lim­i­nal Body: Aus­tralian Cen­tre for Pho­tog­ra­phy (2000 Syd­ney Olympics)
  • Dig­i­tized Bod­ies: Vir­tu­al Spec­ta­cles: Lud­wig Muse­um of Con­tem­po­rary Art (Octo­ber 2000 Budapest, Hun­gary) Mest­na Muse­um Galer­jia (Feb­ru­ary 2001, Lub­jiana Slovenia)
  • …About ENDS (the hope project): Gallery 44, June 2002, Toron­to Canada)

Studies in Compulsive Movement: Anxiety Box No.1

by Simone Jones and Hope Thomp­son, 2002

anxiety-boxStud­ies in Com­pul­sive Move­ment: Anx­i­ety Box No.1 is an inter­ac­tive audio sculp­ture with two ani­ma­tion flip­books. Each flip­book trig­gers a sep­a­rate audio sound­track when picked up and acti­vat­ed by the view­er. The flip­books con­tain ani­mat­ed draw­ings of a repeat­ed body movement.

Through the jux­ta­po­si­tion of the audio sound­tracks and the ani­mat­ed images, the work exam­ines the rela­tion­ship between psy­cho­log­i­cal and phys­i­cal com­pul­sion. Last­ly, both the flip­books and the audio tracks have the poten­tial to loop end­less­ly (com­pul­sive­ly!) the work is com­plet­ed by the inter­ac­tion of the view­er’s the action of acti­vat­ing the flip­book mim­ics the repeat­ed nature of the mov­ing images and loop­ing audio soundtracks.

Simone Jones makes elec­tron­ic sculp­ture and video. Hope Thomp­son is a writer and film­mak­er. Stud­ies in Com­pul­sive Move­ment: Anx­i­ety Box No.1 is their first offi­cial collaboration.


New Zealand


instal­la­tion, 2001, by Sean Kerr (in col­lab­o­ra­tion with Kim Fogelberg)

dot-ivThe instal­la­tion plays upon the beau­ty of sim­plic­i­ty. The work shares Lye “direct phi­los­o­phy” being cre­at­ed entire­ly with­in a com­put­er with no exter­nal sampling.

Dot_IV. reflects my fas­ci­na­tion with musi­cal struc­ture and the asso­ci­a­tion of sound, images and repeat­ing loops,” says Kerr.

Sean Kerr is a Lec­tur­er in Inter­me­dia, Elam Fine Arts School, Uni­ver­si­ty of Auck­land, Auck­land and prac­tices as a Pro­fes­sion­al Visu­al Artists and Free­lance Curator.

Antarctic Heart

instal­la­tion, 2001, by Vir­gina King

antarctic-heartKing draws an anal­o­gy between the human pres­ence in Antarc­ti­ca and the way she works, the anom­aly of her del­i­cate works cre­at­ed by using noisy, aggres­sive machin­ery. Sus­pend­ed macro­carpa sculp­tures are massed togeth­er, evok­ing the com­plex­i­ty and diver­si­ty of their forms in real life as revealed by the elec­tron micro­scope. The works move, turn­ing slow­ly, their move­ment induc­ing a hyp­not­ic effect on the view­er. The sur­vival of life forms is the fun­da­men­tal theme of the work, described by Gilbert Wong as a pos­i­tive state­ment about the tenac­i­ty of life in the extremes. By exag­ger­at­ing the scale King allows us to make oth­er con­nec­tions, to allude to her pre­vi­ous works, some of which also make ref­er­ence to microorganisms.

Sound and light con­tribute to a sense of the sub­ter­ranean and the mys­ti­cal a leap from sci­en­tif­ic data to the inde­fin­able world of the spir­it. The flu­o­res­cent sur­faces of the works are bathed in eerie ultra vio­let light and the dark­ness of the space hints at the jour­ney to Antarc­ti­ca. Ultra vio­let light makes ref­er­ence to research that has been con­duct­ed on its effect on diatoms.

In the video, King has lay­ered and dis­solved elec­tron micro­scope images that are com­put­er coloured and ani­mat­ed with footage she filmed on loca­tion in the extra­or­di­nary Antarc­tic land­scape. These are inter­spersed with images of the sculp­tures and the pres­ence of life forms, their real­i­ty and their new rep­re­sen­ta­tion, is in stark con­trast with the dra­mat­ic vistas.

Vir­ginia King has been exhibit­ing in solo and group exhi­bi­tions since 1978. In 1999 she par­tic­i­pat­ed in the Pacif­ic Rim exhi­bi­tion Vol­ume and Form Sin­ga­pore í99. Her sur­vey exhi­bi­tion Tide­line-Sculp­ture: a ten year sur­vey was pre­sent­ed at Whangarei Art Muse­um. She has made two pre­vi­ous art videos: Pas­sage, 1995 and Styx (Sticks), 1997. Both videos have been includ­ed in the Video pro­gramme orga­nized by the Mov­ing Image Cen­tre as part of the Asia Pacif­ic Tri­en­nale, Bris­bane Art Gallery, Queens­land, Aus­tralia. In 2000 Styx/Sticks was pur­chased by Bris­bane Art Gallery for pub­lic view­ing. Vir­ginia lives in Auck­land and works full time as a sculptor.

The new Siteseer

instal­la­tion, 2002, by Yuk King Tan

new-siteseerUsing rock­ets whose bod­ies con­tain small cam­eras Yuk King Tan has devel­oped a series of “land­scape” images tak­en from the mis­siles down­ward tra­jec­to­ry. The pho­tographs and the art­work dis­cuss the issue of bor­der, ter­ri­to­ry and the divi­sion of land.

The loca­tion of the “take-off” and most of the pho­tographs were sit­u­at­ed at the edge of the Tama­ki Dri­ve between Mis­sion Bay res­i­den­tial and the sea. The under­ly­ing inter­est of the project is the inter­sec­tion between land and har­bour, his­to­ry and devel­op­ment, home and habi­tat. An activ­i­ty like launch­ing a small rock­et breaks the usu­al flow of the dai­ly traf­fic sug­gest­ing a slight shift in con­ven­tion and norm. Evok­ing the sub­tle men­ace of mil­i­tary sur­veil­lance and a humor­ous retake on tourist pho­tog­ra­phy the work sub­tly ques­tions how we may per­ceive land and home.

Yuk King Tan was born in Aus­tralia and is a grad­u­ate with a BFA from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Auck­land. She has had solo exhi­bi­tions across Aus­tralia and New Zealand and par­tic­i­pat­ed in group shows world­wide. Her work has received media reviews in Aus­tralia, New Zealand and Europe.

24 frames reframed

instal­la­tion, 2002, Alex Mon­tei­th in col­lab­o­ra­tion with Dar­ren Glass

24-frames-reframedThe instal­la­tion of this work (which is still in progress and will lat­er become part of a body of works) present­ly involves a sin­gle video pro­jec­tion. The pro­jec­tor is fed its image from a video switch­er (the kind they use in video sur­veil­lance for secu­ri­ty) which reads sig­nals from 4 videos run­ning simul­ta­ne­ous­ly. This switch­er enables the view­ers to select and sequence one after the oth­er any or all of the sig­nals being sent from 1–4 of the video decks. The speed it switch­es between views of the dan­de­lion is variable.

Alex Mon­tei­th is cur­rent­ly study­ing for Doc­tor­ate in Fine Arts at Elam School of Fine Arts, The Uni­ver­si­ty of Auck­land, New Zealand. She has worked and shown her films and videos exten­sive­ly and received pres­ti­gious awards worldwide.



The Glass Bell

instal­la­tion, 2002, Sophea Lerner

the-glass-bellA house haunt­ed by a ghost, a lake haunt­ed by a for­got­ten bell, dreams haunt­ed by a lan­guage you have nev­er learnt to speak… Based on some of the sto­ries the artist’s grand­moth­er took with her when she left the vil­lage in Fin­land where she grew up. A poet­ic rever­ie on lan­guage, mem­o­ry and sep­a­ra­tion The Glass Bell explores the role of sto­ries as place­hold­ers for the unut­ter­able, for what falls between lan­guages and places when we leave.

Here you are on the sur­face of lan­guage, skat­ing on thin ice, what you are say­ing, the words, are not your moth­er tongue. You have nev­er learned to speak her language…”

the-glass-bell-2The Glass Bell has been exhib­it­ed in three forms: As a radio­phon­ic broad­cast for The Lis­ten­ing Room, Aus­tralian Broad­cast­ing Cor­po­ra­tion (ABC), devel­oped dur­ing a Aus­tralia Council/ABC Audio Arts fel­low­ship in 1998 then first shown as an inter­ac­tive audio­graph­ic water instal­la­tion devel­oped col­lab­o­ra­tive­ly for Nextwave Fes­ti­val 2002. This cur­rent ver­sion does not include the col­lab­o­ra­tive inter­ac­tive elements.


  • Text, Images, Sounds Sophea Lerner
  • Trans­la­tion Kaa­ri­na Rauramo
  • Cel­lo & impro­vi­sa­tion: Ion Pearce
  • Vio­la & vio­lin: Natasha Rumiz
  • Per­cus­sion & impro­vi­sa­tion: Tony Lewis
  • Voic­es: Annik­ki Har­ris, Vir­ginia Bax­ter, Eila Him­mel­re­ich, Sophea Lern­er, Zoe Smith
  • Edit­ing and arrange­ment: Sophea Lerner
  • Sound engi­neer: John Jacobs
  • Prin­ci­ple sup­port­ers: The Aus­tralia Coun­cil for the Arts, Nextwave Fes­ti­val, Film Victoria
  • also sup­port­ed by: Muu Media Base, Per­for­mance Space, Uni­ver­si­ty of Tech­nol­o­gy, Sydney.
  • Whilst the inter­ac­tive water­screen is not includ­ed in this ver­sion spe­cial thanks go to code artist Ryan Sabir and design­er Kier­an Larkin for their con­tri­bu­tions to the project as a whole.

Sophea Lern­er is an Aus­tralian sound and dig­i­tal media artist spe­cial­is­ing in inter­ac­tive audio. Her work includes sound per­for­mance, instal­la­tion, film sound and exper­i­men­tal radio fea­tures. She has done lots of dif­fer­ent jobs, most of which have involved get­ting sounds and/or machines to do unex­pect­ed things. She cur­rent­ly lec­tures in media & son­ic arts at the Sibelius Acad­e­my in Helsin­ki.

Machines for Time

sculp­ture, 2001, by Greg Bourke

machines-for-timeA series of three aero­dy­nam­ic mod­els, which are fic­tion­al pro­to­types for high-speed trans­port, with an aura of speed to them. One of the objects for instance, is a ful­ly artic­u­lat­ed machine that moves at a rate of 1 cm a year, this slow­ness is in con­trast with its high speed look­ing design. The objects are not meant to work, and per­haps will nev­er be built to full scale, how­ev­er the con­struc­tion of the mod­els is con­sid­ered, refined and precise.

Greg Bourke is study­ing media arts at the Uni­ver­si­ty of Tas­ma­nia. Ear­li­er ( 1998) he grad­u­at­ed with a diplo­ma in design and desk­top pub­lish­ing. In 2000 he received The Dean’s Roll of Excel­lence from the Uni­ver­si­ty of Tas­ma­nia. In 2001 Bourke exhib­it­ed in the “Mars Attack” exhi­bi­tion at Hobart, Tasmania.

Red (V.3)

instal­la­tion, 2001, by Leigh Hobba

red-v3Red is the sec­ond in a tril­o­gy of works, Red, White and the Blues (1997–2001).

Red is a response to a jour­ney from the Edge of Aus­tralia to the Cen­tre. Two rocks from the bed of the old­est riv­er on the plan­et, click togeth­er in response to an audi­ence approach. A record­ing of a brief, light show­er of rain falling into the riv­er, plays into the space. Some audio manip­u­la­tion of the “click” res­onates through the space. The rocks were select­ed for their sound from all the pos­si­bil­i­ties one has when wan­der­ing down a dry, rock strewn riv­er bed. They are ancient rocks – the click is a clock– the “time­less­ness” of the old­est con­ti­nent and the process of change through weath­er­ing this clock against our fleet­ing inter­ac­tion with the plan­et. The process is con­nect­ed to mechan­i­cal based inter­ac­tion (sole­noid and electro/mechanical trig­ger eg pres­sure mat or light beam) which also trig­gers the sound soft­ware — this wraps the metaphor — time­less nat­ur­al ele­ments — inter­ven­tion and con­trol as a con­tem­po­rary condition.

Leigh Hob­ba cur­rent­ly lives and works in Hobart Tas­ma­nia. Since the 1970s his sound and video instal­la­tions were exhib­it­ed wide­ly across Aus­tralia and abroad. His inter­dis­ci­pli­nary prac­tice includes instal­la­tions, videos, per­for­mances, cura­to­r­i­al work and he has also pub­lished wide­ly, Notably Hob­ba curat­ed “Pulse Fic­tion” (1995) an exhibition/survey of art and atti­tudes affect­ed by the first wave of artists access to media tech­nolo­gies and strate­gies of media based art works through the 1960s and 1970s in Aus­tralia and Imme­di­ate” (2001) — Instal­la­tions that address issues in New Media practice.


instal­la­tion, 2000, by Andrew Burrell

hereThe work “Here” presents the view­er with an inter­nal dia­logue, both sin­gle sided and con­ver­sa­tion­al — cir­cu­lar in nature- with no begin­ning or end. This dia­logue is con­tained with­in two small draw­ers and accessed audi­bly by the view­er each time one or both are opened. Per­haps here real­ly is a place we can­not leave?

Each of the two box­es have a draw­er that upon open­ing allows one half of a con­ver­sa­tion to be played. Only when the view­er real­izes that the voic­es with­in each box are in con­ver­sa­tion and has both draw­ers opened at once, will they hear the com­plete dialogue.

Andrew Bur­rell grad­u­at­ed from the Syd­ney Col­lege of the Arts with an MFA in 2000. He has had solo exhi­bi­tions as far back as 1992 and par­tic­i­pat­ed in sev­er­al group shows across Aus­tralia. Since 1999 Bur­rell has been inten­sive­ly involved in the Polar Cir­cuit project in Lap­land and spent a res­i­den­cy lead­ing up to Finnish exhi­bi­tions at Inari, Lap­land in 2001.

Critical Media